Committee on Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness

2015-2016: (9 Members)

Faculty Representatives (Name, Department, Term Ends)

  1. Changiz Alizadeh, Mathematics And Computer Science (2017)
  2. Georgina Colalillo, Nursing (2017)
  3. Sunil Dehipawala, Physics (2017)
  4. Franca Ferrari-Bridgers, Speech Communication (2018)
  5. JosephGoldenberg, Engineering Technology (2018)
  6. Simran Kaur (Sehmi), Biological Sciences and Geology (2016)
  7. Linda Meltzer, Business (2016) *Co-Chairperson / Co-Secretary
  8. Andrea Salis, Health, Physical Education and Dance (2016) *Co-Chairperson / Co-Secretary
  9. Mark Schiebe, English (2018)

Student Representatives

  1. Dominik Witowski
  2. JC Velasco


  1. David Sarno, Chemistry, COC Liaison
  2. Tammi Rothman, English, Steering Committee Designee
  3. Arthur Corradetti, President's Liaison

Section 11. Committee on Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness

The Committee on Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness shall consist of nine (9) members of the faculty and eligible staff, reflecting, where possible, a balanced representation of faculty from varied programs and curricula, with no more than one representative from any given department; and two (2) students.

The Committee on Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness shall:

  1. Receive and review summary reports describing initiatives to assess student learning from academic departments, academies, and academic programs of the college;
  2. Receive and review documents relating to assessments of institutional effectiveness from all non-academic units of the college;
  3. Make annual reports of progress in assessment of data collection, including:
    1. The receipt of assessment reports from each department/unit of the college;
    2. Courses/college units assessed from each department;
    3. Summary of Assessment data gathered from assessments;
    4. Any departmental conclusions drawn and/or actions taken as a result.
  4. Review assessment procedures the College undertakes and make recommendations concerning these assessment initiatives to the Academic Senate, in support of principles of shared governance, academic freedom and transparency.

Documents and Articles | Agenda and Minutes