|
There is a great need to effectively address and
remedy the inequities in the access to and delivery of health care as
relates to race, class, sexuality, gender and other social factors.
First comes the study and analysis of the current situation from
different perspectives.
A philosophical approach utilizing the scope of
ethical inquiry and application of ethical theories is in order as the
moral implications of the disparities are painfully obvious.
from CHAT GPT Philip Pecorino August 2023
-
Historical Precedence and Stereotypes:
-
Historical gender roles and stereotypes have led to the
perception that certain health issues are more relevant to one
gender or another. For example, women's health issues might be
reduced to reproductive concerns, while men's health is often
narrowly associated with physical strength.
-
Transgender and non-binary individuals have faced discrimination
due to a lack of understanding about their specific health
needs, leading to inappropriate or suboptimal care.
-
Medicalization and Marginalization:
-
Certain conditions related to sex and gender, such as menstrual
health or menopause, have historically been medicalized and
pathologized. This can lead to women's experiences being
dismissed or not taken seriously.
-
Marginalized gender identities, such as transgender and
non-binary individuals, might face pathologization and attempts
to "normalize" them through medical interventions.
-
Stigmatization and Denial of Care:
-
Stigmatization of LGBTQ+ individuals has historically led to
denial of care, particularly in areas like sexual and
reproductive health. For instance, LGBTQ+ individuals might face
reluctance or refusal when seeking fertility treatments or
accessing gender-affirming care.
-
Transgender individuals have faced significant barriers in
accessing hormone therapy or gender-affirming surgeries due to
discriminatory practices and gatekeeping.
-
Healthcare Provider Bias:
-
Implicit biases held by healthcare providers can influence the
quality of care provided. These biases can affect diagnosis,
treatment recommendations, and the overall patient-provider
relationship.
-
LGBTQ+ individuals may avoid disclosing their sexual orientation
or gender identity due to fear of discrimination, leading to
inadequate or inappropriate care.
-
Access Barriers and Disparities:
-
Economic disparities tied to gender roles and systemic sexism
can lead to unequal access to healthcare services. Women and
transgender individuals may face difficulties accessing care due
to financial constraints.
-
Discrimination and socioeconomic disparities can intersect,
further limiting access for individuals who belong to
marginalized groups.
-
Inadequate Research and Data Collection:
-
Biases in medical research have historically excluded certain
genders or gender identities, leading to gaps in understanding
health concerns unique to these groups.
-
LGBTQ+ health issues have often been underrepresented in
research studies, resulting in a lack of evidence-based
guidelines for their healthcare needs.
-
Lack of Comprehensive Education:
-
Medical education has often inadequately covered topics related
to gender and sexuality. This leaves healthcare providers
ill-equipped to understand the needs of diverse patient
populations.
-
Healthcare providers might lack training in offering
gender-affirming care, leading to a shortage of knowledgeable
practitioners.
In
conclusion, social factors related to sex, gender, gender identity, and
sexuality play a significant role in perpetuating discrimination in
healthcare. Historical biases, stereotypes, and lack of understanding
have contributed to unequal access, stigmatization, and inadequate care
for marginalized groups. Addressing these issues requires not only
policy changes but also a fundamental shift in attitudes, education, and
practices within the healthcare system.
CHAT GPT August 2023
Competing philosophical theories of ethics and justice can be applied to
historical and contemporary issues concerning equitable access to
healthcare and the right to equitable care. Utilitarianism, deontology,
and Rawlsian justice are three such theories that can be used to
approach these issues:
-
Utilitarianism:
-
Principle:
The ethical theory of utilitarianism holds that actions are
morally right if they produce the greatest overall happiness or
utility for the greatest number of people.
-
Application:
From a utilitarian perspective, equitable access to healthcare
and equitable care would be seen as desirable if it maximizes
overall well-being and minimizes suffering in society. Policies
that prioritize healthcare access for marginalized groups would
be considered morally justifiable, as they contribute to greater
overall happiness.
-
Deontology:
-
Principle:
Deontology focuses on the inherent rightness or wrongness of
actions, emphasizing duty and adherence to moral principles.
-
Application:
A deontologist might argue that equitable access to healthcare
is a moral duty, as denying healthcare based on factors like
race, gender, or socioeconomic status violates the principle of
treating each individual as an end in themselves, not just a
means to an end. Equitable care would also be a duty, requiring
healthcare providers to prioritize the well-being and rights of
all patients equally.
-
Rawlsian Justice (Theory of Justice):
-
Principle:
John Rawls' theory of justice emphasizes fairness and equality.
His "veil of ignorance" concept posits that just policies would
be created by individuals who don't know their own position in
society.
-
Application:
Applying the veil of ignorance to healthcare, Rawls would argue
that if individuals were unaware of their own social identities
(race, gender, etc.), they would design a healthcare system that
ensures the greatest benefit for the least advantaged. This
perspective supports policies that prioritize equitable access
and care to address the needs of the most vulnerable members of
society.
In
practice, these ethical theories could yield different approaches to
addressing equitable access to healthcare and equitable care:
-
Utilitarianism:
Utilitarian analysis might involve assessing the impact of policies
on the overall well-being of society. Prioritizing marginalized
groups could be justified if it produces a net increase in happiness
and reduces suffering.
-
Deontology:
A deontological approach would emphasize the inherent rights of
individuals. Policies and practices that respect the rights and
dignity of all patients, regardless of their background, would align
with this perspective.
-
Rawlsian Justice:
Applying Rawls' theory, policies would focus on minimizing the
disparities between advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Healthcare
systems that prioritize those with the greatest need, regardless of
social identity, would align with Rawlsian principles.
It's important to note that these theories might not always provide
clear-cut solutions, and there can be conflicts between different
ethical principles. In practice, policymakers often consider a
combination of these ethical perspectives to develop comprehensive
approaches that balance the complexities of equitable access to
healthcare and equitable care.
The Ethics of Health Disparities
Larry Polivka, Ph.D. 2015
https://claudepeppercenter.fsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Generations-Article-The-Ethics-of-Health-Disparities-9-2014.pdf
Proceed to the next section of the chapter by clicking here>
next section.
© Copyright Philip A. Pecorino 2002. All Rights
reserved.
Web Surfer's Caveat: These are class notes, intended
to comment on readings and amplify class discussion. They should be read
as such. They are not intended for publication or general distribution. |