Chapter 17 : A Claim of a Right to Health Care |
Section 5. Case Study
HMO_REVIEW_by_INDEPENDENT_MD Michael Milazzo Case Title: Supreme Court Hears Landmark HMO Case Brought by Speech-Language PathologistDescription : In one of the most important health care cases in years, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday over whether states can require an independent physician review when HMOs deny patients medical coverage.Describing case: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washdc/2002/01/17/usat-court.htm http://professional.asha.org/news/020305b.cfm http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/amnews/amn_02/edsa0114.htm http://216.36.252.42/news_justices_rule.htm http://www.body1.com/news/index.cfm/1/93/1 http://special.northernlight.com/managedcare/hmo_ruling.htm Ethical Positions: http://www.postgradmed.com/issues/1997/09_97/ed_sep.htm http://www.pwc.org/newsltr/summer97/art3.html http://www.managedcaremag.com/archives/9911/9911.ethics.html http://www.heartland.org/pdf/32524a.pdf http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/longterm/ethics/ethics1.htm http://www.harp.org/peeno.htm
|
Proceed to the DECISION SCENARIO section of the chapter by clicking here> section. © Copyright Philip A. Pecorino 2002. All Rights reserved. Web Surfer's Caveat: These are class notes, intended to comment on readings and amplify class discussion. They should be read as such. They are not intended for publication or general distribution. |
Return to: Table of Contents for the Online Textbook |