Philosophy of Religion |
Chapter 5 Arguments for the Existence of God: Experience |
Section 3. Revelation |
There is an argument to prove that god exists. It is based upon sacred scripture. It is based on the belief that god has revealed god’s existence to humans through the creation or inspiration of the text, which is then thought to be a sacred text. Humans experience the text directly and through that experience many believe that they have contact with the deity. Revelation consists of: Sacred Texts- · Inspired by the deity/intermediary · Dictated by the deity/intermediary ·
Written by the deity/intermediary Argument from Revelation or Scripture:
There are different sorts of problems with this argument: LOGICAL PROBLEM: Fallacy: Classic circular argument This argument assumes what it is trying to prove and thus is considered to be one of the poorest arguments of all those offered to prove the existence of god. You must accept that the book is from god in order to accept it as being truthful and accurate and then when you accept it as being truthful and accurate you read in it that there is a deity and so conclude that there is a god and that is what you needed to think in order to accept the book as being truthful and accurate in the first place. This circular reasoning would not convince a rational person who was not already a believer ion a deity that three was a deity. PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEM: In addition today there are many people who refuse to believe that the texts are accurate descriptions of events that occurred long ago. People are aware of the psychological phenomenon whereby people who repeat tales are inclined to exaggerate or otherwise distort what actually occurred. Events might have been seen in retrospect as having been directed by a deity or as having some meaning in terms of a plan devised by a deity or as symbolic of the deity. Finally, it is now known that what have been considered to be sacred texts were voted upon by the leaders of the religious movements. Certain texts were excluded and others included by deliberate calculation of the practical results desired by those who had the power to declare the texts to be officially inspired or written by the deity. The use of texts that are considered by some to be sacred are not likely to prove to the non-believer that they are sacred. The use of the texts to prove to a non-believer that there is a sacred source for the inspiration to the authors of the texts is not likely to be convincing when there are alternative explanations for what was created so long ago. Those alternative explanations having to do with human psychology and sociology are being accepted by steadily increasing number of people, including those who claim to be religious. Most simply can not believe that the reports contained with the scriptures are accurate or true and fewer and fewer can accept the texts as being directed by the deity. TRUTH PROBLEM A ) V ARIATIONS in the SACRED TEXTS of the western religions:What version is the official version of the "holy book"? Why? What versions of these sacred scriptures are to be taken as the OFFICIAL and the truthful versions? In all three traditions of the West: Judaism, Christianity and Islam, there are records to indicate that there were and are variations on the sacred texts. In all three traditions a time came when the community needed to determine what the official version or the Canon would be. JUDAISM The cannon is the Tanakh is also called מקרא, Mikra or Miqra, meaning "that which is read", referring to the Jewish practice of public reading from the Scripture while in synagogue .On the development of the canon for the bible today used by the Judaic tradition read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_of_the_Jewish_Bible_canon There are books that are not included in the Hebrew Bible. They are Apocryphal and include: Tobit, III and IV Esdras and another omitted book is that of the Book of Enoch. Read one translation of it here: http://www.heaven.net.nz/writings/thebookofenoch.htm ARTFL Project: This site offers various online versions of the Bible in different languages. The site is organized to facilitate comparison of the versions: http://estragon.uchicago.edu/Bibles/ Dead Sea Scrolls: A selection from the scrolls is available for on-line scrutiny. This site provides information on the historical context of the scrolls and the Qumran community from whence they may have originated. It also relates the story of their discovery 2,000 years later. In addition, the site aims to introduce us to the challenges and complexities connected with scroll research: http://metalab.unc.edu/expo/deadsea.scrolls.exhibit/intro.html Journal of Hebrew Scriptures: This site contains abstracts from articles published in the Journal, as well as some bibliographies concerned with the Hebrew Scriptures: http://www.arts.ualberta.ca/JHS/ CHRISTIANITY What books? What testaments? What gospels? On the development of the Christian Cannon or the New Testament read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_of_the_Christian_biblical_canon New Testament Web Resources: Maintained by Mark Goodacre, this excellent site is an up to date, annotated guide to good academic New Testament web resources. This site will be of interest to both students and teachers: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/goodacre/links.htm Society of Biblical Literature: This site provides an interesting list of Electronic Resources for Biblical Studies: http://scholar.cc.emory.edu/scripts/SBL/SBL-MENU.html On the New Testament: Here is a collection of early Christian writings that includes gospels that were not accepted into the official cannon. http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/ The Gnostic Gospels http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/story/pagels.html ISLAM On the Quran: The developement of the Koran or Quran read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_and_development_of_the_Koran Origins: by scholar Ibn Warraq
see more on this here http://www.secularislam.org/research/origins.htm or here Origins of the Koran PROBLEM: VARIATIONS in the Koran see: http://answering-islam.org/Green/seven.htm
B) NO VERIFICATION of stories in the BIBLE or VERIFICATION not Possible
The purpose of this text in this section is not apologetics nor theology nor
interpretation. The purpose is to point out that there are problems with the
text of the bible and the basic sacred texts of the Western religions if the
reports of events are taken literally as some fundamentalists insist
on doing. If people are wiling to look at the text and consider
non-literal interpretations and to look at the meanings and possible value
of the text for individuals and groups then the question or issue with its
accuracy and truthfulness may be set aside or overcome. More on this
in a later chapter on Religious Language World Views and Reason. As was previously noted in the chapter on Religion and
Science, there is no conflict between the two if: 1) the claims in the bible are not taken literally but are interpreted
and the meaning of the bible text and the lessons of the text are given
importance over their veracity as reporting events and making empirical
claims. 2) science studies religion as a natural phenomena with manifestations at
the level of individual experience and group experiences that functions in a
number of ways for individuals and societies. Are there any parts of the sacred texts that may be true
in an empirical and historical sense?
Probably there are, but it is difficult to determine which would be true. READ: Bible , Truth and Knowledge ====================================================== PROBLEMS WITH THE BIBLE FLAT EARTH The shape of the planet would need to be one of a FLAT EARTH if the Bible is literally true. The flatness of the earth's surface is required by verses such as these: Daniel 4:10-11. the king “saw a tree of great height at the centre of the earth...reaching with its top to the sky and visible to the earth's farthest bounds.” Isaiah 11:12 "And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth." Matthew 4:8: "Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world" Luke 4:5: "And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time." Revelation 1:7: “Behold, he is coming with the clouds! Every eye shall see him...” Revelation 7:1 "And after these things I saw four angels standing on four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree."
OTHER PROBLEMS WITH THE BIBLE, NEW TESTAMENT and OLD
TESTAMENT
Introduction to the Bible and Biblical Problems
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/intro.html Biblical Absurdities
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/absurd.html
http://faithskeptic.50megs.com/absurdities.htm Biblical Flaws
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/flaws.html Biblical Atrocities
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/atrocity.html
http://faithskeptic.50megs.com/atrocities.htm Biblical Inconsistencies
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/inconsistencies.html Biblical Vulgarities
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/vulgar.html Biblical Contradictions
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7273/biblicalcontradictions.html
http://faithskeptic.50megs.com/contradictions.htm
Two Creations
http://faithskeptic.50megs.com/creation.htm Problems With the Idea of a Deity that is Supreme and
All Good
http://liberalslikechrist.org/about/problemswithGOD.html Bible errors
http://liberalslikechrist.org/about/whatkindofgod-1.html
http://www.slideshare.net/Kukuasu/david-icke-bible-errors
Stat Stationary and Flat Earth
http://faithskeptic.50megs.com/flat.htm NOTES ON BIBLE PROBLEMS Compiled by Richard Packham
http://home.teleport.com/~packham/bible.htm Problems with the Integrity of the Bible~ James Buckner
~
http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~slocks/james/tough.html Some Reasons Why Humanists Reject The Bible by Joseph
C. Sommer
http://www.americanhumanist.org/humanism/Some_Reasons_Why_Humanists_Reject_the_Bible The Bible Problem Dr.
Charles R. Vogan Jr., Ph.D. http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/mvz/bible/bible-inconsistencies.pdf 6. http://www .talkreason.org/articles/bible-science.cfm
SCIENCE AND THE BIBLE: SOME CONFLICTS
http://www.religioustolerance.org/sci_bibl.htm
OUTCOME: The Argument:
1. The scriptures say that God exists. (Bible, Koran, Vedas, etc.)
4. God
is the source and guarantee of truth
CONCLUSION: God Exists Problem with argument:
1.
_X___Premises are false or questionable
2.
____Premises are irrelevant
3.
_X___Premises Contain the Conclusion –Circular Reasoning
4.
____Premises are inadequate to support the conclusion
5.
__X__Alternative arguments exist with equal or greater support
This argument or proof based on Revelation has flaws in it and would not
convince a rational person to accept its conclusion. This is not
because someone who does not believe in a deity will simply refuse to accept
based on emotions or past history but because it is not rationally
compelling of acceptance of its conclusion.
|
Proceed to the next section by clicking here> next © Copyright Philip A. Pecorino 2001. All Rights reserved. Web Surfer's Caveat: These are class notes, intended to comment on readings and amplify class discussion. They should be read as such. They are not intended for publication or general distribution. |
Return to: Table of Contents for the Online Textbook |